While I was reading Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching and Quaalities of the Prince I think I may
have gotten rather hung up on trying to determine which modern political
philosophy each of these would be most similar to. I don’t think I was really
able to successfully match either of these philosophies up to one of the
political parties in the United States. The closest that I could come to this
would be to say that the philosophies proposed by Lao Tzu in Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching have some
similarities with some of those that are looking for a smaller government. I
noticed that Lao Tzu often said that it is best to avoid intervening in
situations, which is somewhat similar to the idea of limited government that is
often talked about today. The closet thing I could come up with for Machiavelli
was the caricaturized image of republicans that was often seen on shows like The Daily Show during the time that
President Bush was in power.
As far
as my thoughts of the philosophies themselves I felt those of Machiavelli to
almost be cynical. Cynical may not be the right word exactly, but he seemed to
assume that there was going to at least be a small group of people that would
ruin one’s ability to seem like the good guy all the time. I personally liked
this way of looking at things much more than what Lao Tzu was proposing. From
Lao Tzu I got a much more idealist vibe, which while I often like to think of
things in the nice clean way to look at things it is usually not a complete
enough view on the way that people really operate. Maybe thinking these things
makes me somewhat cynical too (though I’m still not sure that’s the right word
again).
No comments:
Post a Comment